Phone support matters
I’ve got a phone line in my new flat at last. I had wondered whether I could manage without a fixed line, but the latency and spottiness of 3G data connections has convinced me that I still need some old-skool copper for a decent internet experience.
Since the local exchange (Bermondsey) has terrible contention on the BT ADSL network, I wanted to use an LLU operator—that is, one who has their own equipment in the exchange, and who doesn’t rely on BT for any more than the last mile (or two) of wire.
I’d heard good things about both Be and O2, who share the same hardware and backbone but operate as separate companies. I started off at Be’s website, and typed in my phone number. (Web developers will want to point and laugh at the form that says ‘Copy & paste is not permitted in this field’; view the source for full humorous impact.) The computer said:
Unfortunately Be is not available in your area yet.
That’s not true: I know for a fact that they have equipment at the Bermondsey exchange.
So I phoned them, and got through to an offshore call centre somewhere I couldn’t quite identify. The person I spoke to was charming and competent, but that’s all. She was able to tell me that there was an existing account associated with the number, but couldn’t take it any further.
On a whim, I decided to see what O2’s website had to say:
Order already exists against this number in system.
Despite the geeky terseness of the message, it was at least accurate, unlike Be’s website which appears to make the cardinal sin of catching any error and assuming that it’s the most common one.
Right next to it, they had a free phone number, so I called them. This time, I got through to a Scottish chap who was actually able to help me. He went to talk to a manager to work out how to deal with the unusual situation. He called me back on the same number to verify that it was correct—having taken a mobile number first, just in case. He submitted a request to BT, gave me a case number, and told me to call back if I haven’t heard back by Saturday.
This wasn’t an offshore/onshore issue per se—it was one of initiative, and I’m sure that the way that call centres are managed and their staff evaluated is at least as important as any other factor. The fact remains, though, that whereas Be’s phone support wasn’t able to break out and handle this odd case, O2’s was. And that’s why I’ll be signing up with them for ADSL service.
Once they’ve sorted out this minor problem, that is.
2009-04-30 19:59 UTC. Comments: 4.
Tom Taylor
Wrote at 2009-04-30 21:28 UTC using Safari 525.27.1 on Mac OS X:
The bizarre thing is that O2 (big telco) own Be (young Swedish upstart). You’d have thought it would be the other way round.Rob
Wrote at 2009-04-30 22:12 UTC using Firefox 3.0.9 on Windows Vista:
Paul how did you know that the contention on the BT network was bad in your location? Is there any website that can give the contention details of providers in the exchange?Paul Battley
Wrote at 2009-05-01 08:30 UTC using Firefox 3.0.10 on Mac OS X:
Rob, have a look at my previous (very angry!) post on the subject.Chris
Wrote at 2009-05-04 15:48 UTC using Firefox 3.0.8 on Windows Vista:
Good choice for O2, have had them installed in my flat now for about 4 months and never once had any issues with them.I can get a maximum of 18mb out of them, I know this as when they switched on my service it took them a couple of days to throttle my net experience down to the 8mb I was paying for.